Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
31
Wikkity! / Re: Post your face!
« on: August 23, 2008, 12:34:22 am »
CF, you look very familiar, I feel as if I've met you at one point in time
or maybe I'm just going teh crazy
or maybe I'm just going teh crazy
32
Leaderboard Disputes / Re: ATTN: Mike89 and Ninty D:
« on: August 13, 2008, 10:44:35 pm »
My opinion has always been against these sort of things, even if it common practice, so I guess it's funny that I did it myself without even realizing. Although to be honest I'm not that much against it. I guess it really depends on the situation. The one thing that really did get on my nerves though was any time, score, or ring record with a 0 in it. People filling up charts with just 0's is rather lame in my opinion. If you want a score for a level just do a run through it, even if it's terrible, and at least then it'll be better than 0
But anyway, I'm getting off topic. In regards to one of my few remaining records ( :( ) I'd say get rid of it because even though it's at least 80,000 in theory because of the time bonus, I'm almost 99.9999% positive that I set that record in time attack mode, and time/ring bonuses aren't awarded in that mode. Sure, you could still just apply the time bonus in theory, but I've noticed that for every game that I've been up to date with at TSC we've always followed the way the games record rankings. Even for sonic advance 3, although it took a while, unidivision rankings were eventually used (which is exactly the way the game tracks time records). Granted, most of these games don't keep track of score or ring records within the actual memory (in fact, I don't think any do) but I'm sure that if, say, sonic advance did keep track of hi scores for each level it would have recorded a score of 2,400 for the 29 second run instead of 82,400
Basically, I guess I'm saying that I don't really approve of all this theory crap. If something's theoretical, then that's exactly what it is, theoretical, not factual. In theory I could of gotten a score of 80,000+ but I didn't, the game only awarded me however many points I got in that run without bonuses, therefore that's what my score is.
But anyway, I'm getting off topic. In regards to one of my few remaining records ( :( ) I'd say get rid of it because even though it's at least 80,000 in theory because of the time bonus, I'm almost 99.9999% positive that I set that record in time attack mode, and time/ring bonuses aren't awarded in that mode. Sure, you could still just apply the time bonus in theory, but I've noticed that for every game that I've been up to date with at TSC we've always followed the way the games record rankings. Even for sonic advance 3, although it took a while, unidivision rankings were eventually used (which is exactly the way the game tracks time records). Granted, most of these games don't keep track of score or ring records within the actual memory (in fact, I don't think any do) but I'm sure that if, say, sonic advance did keep track of hi scores for each level it would have recorded a score of 2,400 for the 29 second run instead of 82,400
Basically, I guess I'm saying that I don't really approve of all this theory crap. If something's theoretical, then that's exactly what it is, theoretical, not factual. In theory I could of gotten a score of 80,000+ but I didn't, the game only awarded me however many points I got in that run without bonuses, therefore that's what my score is.
33
Wikkity! / Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TACO
« on: August 01, 2008, 08:17:13 am »
:o
I have not been forgotten!
thank you kind friends :)
oh, and I have been around, but whenever I've tried to enter the chatroom lately my computer freezes up, so I don't know what the dealio is :/
I have not been forgotten!
thank you kind friends :)
oh, and I have been around, but whenever I've tried to enter the chatroom lately my computer freezes up, so I don't know what the dealio is :/
34
Competition Central / Re: Congratulations, DarkspinesSonic!
« on: May 29, 2008, 08:09:46 pm »
404 :(
35
Beef / Re: Why is rolken banned.?
« on: May 28, 2008, 03:58:35 pm »
wait what are you guys talking about?
Rolken really was banned!
your all idiots! Idiots I tellz ya!
Rolken really was banned!
your all idiots! Idiots I tellz ya!
36
Competition Central / Re: Knuckles_Sonic 8
« on: May 24, 2008, 04:00:50 am »
why are you bothering with this?
If he wants to come back, then he should be making this topic, not you
If he wants to come back, then he should be making this topic, not you
37
Beef / Re: I would like to have my competition name changed.
« on: May 21, 2008, 07:21:14 pm »
blue is the color of depression, and depression leads to ANGER!
38
Competition Central / Re: The Top Ten TSCers Of All Time
« on: April 22, 2008, 10:53:20 am »
OH MAN!
I TOTALLY DID NOT SEE THAT COMING!!!
SHOCK VALUE = AWESOME SURPRISING CRAZYNESS
how did you find this all out by the way? Because I never see ss101 anymore : /
but anyway, congrats supersonic! I really want to see him play guitar hero now!
I TOTALLY DID NOT SEE THAT COMING!!!
SHOCK VALUE = AWESOME SURPRISING CRAZYNESS
how did you find this all out by the way? Because I never see ss101 anymore : /
but anyway, congrats supersonic! I really want to see him play guitar hero now!
39
Wikkity! / Re: oh wow
« on: April 20, 2008, 11:40:48 pm »
I'm not registered on that board
sorry, I guess I forgot to post the rest of my initial message for some reason
I guess I just find it funny that he came here 4 years ago starting crap in an accomplishment's thread, and now (4 year later) he happens to make an accomplishment thread. I'm kind of tempted to register there and start behaving the way he initially did when he registered here just to post in the thread, but that's probably not the best idea since it wouldn't display a very good image for TSC. plus, he seems to have grown up
I don't know, I guess this thread is pointless, but I just thought maybe some of the older members might get a kick out of this
sorry, I guess I forgot to post the rest of my initial message for some reason
I guess I just find it funny that he came here 4 years ago starting crap in an accomplishment's thread, and now (4 year later) he happens to make an accomplishment thread. I'm kind of tempted to register there and start behaving the way he initially did when he registered here just to post in the thread, but that's probably not the best idea since it wouldn't display a very good image for TSC. plus, he seems to have grown up
I don't know, I guess this thread is pointless, but I just thought maybe some of the older members might get a kick out of this
40
http://www.ddronlinecommunity.com/forums/3/forum_topics/27
and for anyone that doesn't know or remember what I'm referring to:
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=760.90
which was originally part of this thread:
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=555.0
and for anyone that doesn't know or remember what I'm referring to:
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=760.90
which was originally part of this thread:
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=555.0
41
Wikkity! / Re: Post your face!
« on: April 16, 2008, 11:01:55 am »
ok, wtf
mikey looks more like a rolken IMO (or that rabbit from monster rancher)
what is up with that?
mikey looks more like a rolken IMO (or that rabbit from monster rancher)
what is up with that?
42
News and Updates / Re: Should we add Brawl?
« on: March 20, 2008, 04:55:50 pm »
It seems that the decision to add brawl to our official rankings ties in with other recent site matters, such as site expansion, keeping the site alive and interesting, etc
I think adding brawl to the rankings would be a great idea because it would help resolve these problems. I don't think brawl should be added
in as a sonic game to TSC site because it's not a sonic game, I don't define it as one. I don't know if there's really a set definition for what defines a game to be a sonic game, but I would say a sonic game is a game in which the environment, storyline, and characters all take place somewhere in the sonic universe. While brawl has certain themes, elements, characters, from some sonic games, the game itself is not established in the universe of sonic. It isn't established in the universe of mario either, or Pit, or Kirby, or Samus, or any of the other characters for that matter. The smash series is its own separate universe, and should therefore be treated as one.
Like I stated earlier, I would love to see rankings for brawl on the site, just not on the main site. I don't really see why we can't add it as a subsite, or why it should really make a difference if it's not on the main site, but a subsite of its own. Am I missing something here? Even if brawl was added to the main site, everyone would still only be competing in brawl. The other sonic games would still be "dead". Unless you're suggesting that adding brawl to the main site will perhaps bring in many new players to spark up competition in the old sonic games? But I still don't see why adding brawl to the main site would be any different than adding it as a subsite, or why the subsite addition of brawl wouldn't be able to accomplish the same thing. Plus, if we did add brawl to the main sonic rankings, and lets say it did get very popular and people wanted to start up some rankings for melee and old skool smash, where would those go? Certainly not in the main site, since sonic is non-existant in those two games. It would just be a huge mess. I think it would be much more efficient to simply add brawl (and any of the other smash games) to a seperate subsite called the Smash Center, or whatever
A few other things / incoherent ramblings on my mind:
When we started the whole subsites concept, we added games that never really had any official rankings chart, but were still deemed popular (or worthy for competition). While I really want to add brawl to the sub site rankings, I find it somewhat hard to believe that there is no other source of record keeping (other than cyberscore, which doesn't count) for the super smash brothers games. There are many communities for the games out there (the biggest being smashboards probably). Does no one know of any of these sites or communities that have a well known ranking system for the game? If not, well then it's all the more reason to at least add it as a subsite.
gah, I had a few other things in my head, but I'm really unfocused right now, so I apologize if my post came out sounding kind of funny
I think sooner or later though we are going to have to make a decision as to whether we still want to be "Main Site - The Sonic Center, with competition in other games" or "Main Site - The Competitive games we deem pro Center". In the case of the latter, TSC would become a subsite.
But yes, I want brawl rankings! Brawl got me somewhat back into time attacking, and I'm really curious to see how a few of my BTT times compare to others!
I think adding brawl to the rankings would be a great idea because it would help resolve these problems. I don't think brawl should be added
in as a sonic game to TSC site because it's not a sonic game, I don't define it as one. I don't know if there's really a set definition for what defines a game to be a sonic game, but I would say a sonic game is a game in which the environment, storyline, and characters all take place somewhere in the sonic universe. While brawl has certain themes, elements, characters, from some sonic games, the game itself is not established in the universe of sonic. It isn't established in the universe of mario either, or Pit, or Kirby, or Samus, or any of the other characters for that matter. The smash series is its own separate universe, and should therefore be treated as one.
Like I stated earlier, I would love to see rankings for brawl on the site, just not on the main site. I don't really see why we can't add it as a subsite, or why it should really make a difference if it's not on the main site, but a subsite of its own. Am I missing something here? Even if brawl was added to the main site, everyone would still only be competing in brawl. The other sonic games would still be "dead". Unless you're suggesting that adding brawl to the main site will perhaps bring in many new players to spark up competition in the old sonic games? But I still don't see why adding brawl to the main site would be any different than adding it as a subsite, or why the subsite addition of brawl wouldn't be able to accomplish the same thing. Plus, if we did add brawl to the main sonic rankings, and lets say it did get very popular and people wanted to start up some rankings for melee and old skool smash, where would those go? Certainly not in the main site, since sonic is non-existant in those two games. It would just be a huge mess. I think it would be much more efficient to simply add brawl (and any of the other smash games) to a seperate subsite called the Smash Center, or whatever
A few other things / incoherent ramblings on my mind:
When we started the whole subsites concept, we added games that never really had any official rankings chart, but were still deemed popular (or worthy for competition). While I really want to add brawl to the sub site rankings, I find it somewhat hard to believe that there is no other source of record keeping (other than cyberscore, which doesn't count) for the super smash brothers games. There are many communities for the games out there (the biggest being smashboards probably). Does no one know of any of these sites or communities that have a well known ranking system for the game? If not, well then it's all the more reason to at least add it as a subsite.
gah, I had a few other things in my head, but I'm really unfocused right now, so I apologize if my post came out sounding kind of funny
I think sooner or later though we are going to have to make a decision as to whether we still want to be "Main Site - The Sonic Center, with competition in other games" or "Main Site - The Competitive games we deem pro Center". In the case of the latter, TSC would become a subsite.
But yes, I want brawl rankings! Brawl got me somewhat back into time attacking, and I'm really curious to see how a few of my BTT times compare to others!
43
Leaderboard Disputes / Re: ATTN:Copyrighted video???
« on: March 06, 2008, 05:52:09 pm »
People steal stuff on the internet all the time.
44
General Sonic / Re: How many sonic games do you own?
« on: March 03, 2008, 01:08:42 pm »Quote
I don't know how I didn't encounter this topic in its original time... I just thought it was new when I saw it on the board page
heh, that's what I thought too actually. I thought a bunch of old users like ybbun came back to the site again
As for games, I recall owning the following off the top of my head
Sega Genesis
Sonic 1
Sonic 2
Sonic 3
Sonic & Knuckles
Sonic Spinball
Game Gear
Sonic 2
PC
Sonic CD
Gamecube
Sonic Adventure DX
Sonic Adventure 2 Battle
Sonic Heroes
Sonic Gems Collection
Game Boy Advance
Sonic Advance 1
Sonic Advance 2
Sonic Advance 3
Looks like I only own 14 sonic games :/
45
Competition Central / Re: Mixed-up Stats
« on: January 20, 2008, 03:33:34 pm »
Me thinks this should be put in the page FAQ if its not in there already. I'm pretty sure this isn't the first topic I've seen asking this (what to do if you submit a wrong stat)
46
General Sonic / Re: Pokemon - SonicBlue Version
« on: January 19, 2008, 11:12:12 pm »
Do I have to do anything?
because if not, then I want to be a gym leader
and make my pokemon type Taco ok thankyous
because if not, then I want to be a gym leader
and make my pokemon type Taco ok thankyous
47
Wikkity! / Re: ITT we heartily showcase our love for balls
« on: January 06, 2008, 10:29:12 pm »
awesome
49
Rules Revisions / Re: Sonic 2 GG - Act 3s
« on: December 07, 2007, 02:47:03 pm »
I agree
I say we should just go by what the game offers. If the levels have a time/score counter to determine our stats for a level, then we should use it. If it doesn't, then I don't think we should because there is no set basis. People might get slightly different answers if you need to start figuring out your time and score for a level, and that doesn't seem very reliable
I say we should just go by what the game offers. If the levels have a time/score counter to determine our stats for a level, then we should use it. If it doesn't, then I don't think we should because there is no set basis. People might get slightly different answers if you need to start figuring out your time and score for a level, and that doesn't seem very reliable
50
Gaming and Grazing / Re: Your top 10 favorite games - One per franchise
« on: November 28, 2007, 07:15:29 pm »
Number 1 and 2 on the list I've been playing like mad recently
10. Tony Hawk's Underground (GCN)
9. Shivers (PC)
8. F-Zero X (N64)
7. Diddy Kong Racing (N64)
6. Majoras Mask (N64) // Go ahead, shoot me, I don't care
5. Metroid: Zero Mission (GBA)
4. Sonic 3 & Knuckles (Genesis)
3. Age of Empires II (PC)
2. Super Smash Brothers Melee (GC)
1. Stepmania (PC)
EDIT: I actually enjoy S3&K over advance more. I like playing through the levels over and over again
10. Tony Hawk's Underground (GCN)
9. Shivers (PC)
8. F-Zero X (N64)
7. Diddy Kong Racing (N64)
6. Majoras Mask (N64) // Go ahead, shoot me, I don't care
5. Metroid: Zero Mission (GBA)
4. Sonic 3 & Knuckles (Genesis)
3. Age of Empires II (PC)
2. Super Smash Brothers Melee (GC)
1. Stepmania (PC)
EDIT: I actually enjoy S3&K over advance more. I like playing through the levels over and over again
51
Gaming and Grazing / Re: Advance Wars By Web
« on: November 26, 2007, 12:40:51 pm »
oh ma god
mike is one post away from 1337 status
:O
EDIT: And I am 6 posts away from lucky status!
EDIT 2: oh, also, yeah I would be interested in a game this weekend because I don't think this weekend will be too busy for me.
mike is one post away from 1337 status
:O
EDIT: And I am 6 posts away from lucky status!
EDIT 2: oh, also, yeah I would be interested in a game this weekend because I don't think this weekend will be too busy for me.
53
Wikkity! / Re: ITT rooms and stuff
« on: November 11, 2007, 04:53:41 pm »
http://rapidshare.com/files/69060520/omg_it_s_teh_nintendan_s_house_.wmv.html
This is an OLD video I made many years ago. I made this for a specific individual to be honest, so there might be a few wtf moments, but I do tour the house
I think I had a cold back then or something because my voice sounds deeper than usual
oh well, enjoy I guess
This is an OLD video I made many years ago. I made this for a specific individual to be honest, so there might be a few wtf moments, but I do tour the house
I think I had a cold back then or something because my voice sounds deeper than usual
oh well, enjoy I guess
54
Wikkity! / Re: Magic: The Gathering Personality Quiz: What Color Are You?
« on: November 11, 2007, 04:39:04 am »
white
55
General Sonic / Re: Guiness World Records: Gaming Edition (about TSC getting in)
« on: November 09, 2007, 08:40:06 pm »
Hasn't this already been done?
57
General Sonic / Re: idea: TSC 2008 calendar
« on: October 30, 2007, 09:27:50 am »
you were pwned!
The Sonic Center v3.9
Copyright 2003-2011 by The Sonic Center Team.