Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
31
Gaming and Grazing / Re: BERTIN THE BEAR GAME PROJECT
« on: July 18, 2008, 06:34:54 pm »Dead game is dead? but I even made drowning music in the style of rage meter. :(
Needs moar original piece.
33
Gaming and Grazing / Re: BERTIN THE BEAR GAME PROJECT
« on: July 13, 2008, 12:58:47 pm »
I can bs sprites too.
Also level ideas like Honey Fail Act Tree (yes tree).
Also surprise pic to come soon.
Also level ideas like Honey Fail Act Tree (yes tree).
Also surprise pic to come soon.
34
Wikkity! / Re: in one week
« on: July 10, 2008, 10:05:09 am »
I WILL ARRIVE FASHIONABLY LATE DUE TO WORK.
BUT I WILL BE THERE.
BUT I WILL BE THERE.
35
Wikkity! / Re: ITT, Psyknux documents my stat comments :D
« on: July 09, 2008, 06:47:17 pm »you are a very frustrated manWHO LOVES ORANGE SODA?
you should have some orange soda
Everyone who hasn't been touched by RPG.
* Rick drinks more orange soda
36
Hax0ring / Re: Bored again, back to haxxing
« on: July 08, 2008, 11:14:55 pm »
Music is good but, Zone 2 music needs some work. Not exactly feeling it (though iono what it is anyway). The scenery from Zone 1 is somewhat... bland. Mainly the pink.
Also, the overworld idea is sexy. I might have came.
As per usual I provide a pic of some hax. This is one is more due to spring placement.
Pretty good for a small beta.
:thumbs up:
Also, the overworld idea is sexy. I might have came.
As per usual I provide a pic of some hax. This is one is more due to spring placement.
Pretty good for a small beta.
:thumbs up:
37
Emerald Challenges / Re: Emerald Challenges Unofficially Over
« on: July 06, 2008, 02:38:32 pm »Of course I care!
HAH I TOLD YOU THORN AND RPG.
38
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: July 05, 2008, 07:51:58 pm »
Well douglas, the bs stats.
<GerbilSoft> also
<GerbilSoft> i remember one of elecmouse's stats
<GerbilSoft> 1:02:01
<Zeph> what stefan :(
<GerbilSoft> for rush
<Stefan> you aren't supposed to be better at times than me :(
<Rick> good but for what level >_>
<GerbilSoft> that triggered the fake submissions checker
I looked at the video and found something interesting.
There is no "1:02:01" anywhere on the video. But, I have a good reason to say that what GS said is in fact not the bs stat.
Look at 1:16 - 1:30 of: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrTKiglH0-I
4th stat reads "1:02:10"
I doubt I need to explain myself here.
<GerbilSoft> also
<GerbilSoft> i remember one of elecmouse's stats
<GerbilSoft> 1:02:01
<Zeph> what stefan :(
<GerbilSoft> for rush
<Stefan> you aren't supposed to be better at times than me :(
<Rick> good but for what level >_>
<GerbilSoft> that triggered the fake submissions checker
I looked at the video and found something interesting.
There is no "1:02:01" anywhere on the video. But, I have a good reason to say that what GS said is in fact not the bs stat.
Look at 1:16 - 1:30 of: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrTKiglH0-I
4th stat reads "1:02:10"
I doubt I need to explain myself here.
39
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: July 05, 2008, 06:47:20 pm »
I didn't say that you uploaded with the comp that was 98. I said that a comp with 98 did not stop from uploading youtube videos. This can mean you waited hours on the comp with 98 just to upload videos or you found a way around it.
40
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: July 05, 2008, 12:20:20 pm »
A 98 with dialup did not stop you from uploading videos.
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?p=r&user=elecmouse101&page=5
You could upload videos from now-4 months ago.
I have no idea what went on with the photos; only that GerbilSoft never viewed them but, acknowledged that you did send them.
Original post here: http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=3063.0
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?p=r&user=elecmouse101&page=5
You could upload videos from now-4 months ago.
I have no idea what went on with the photos; only that GerbilSoft never viewed them but, acknowledged that you did send them.
Original post here: http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=3063.0
41
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: July 05, 2008, 10:52:12 am »
RPG: Yeah I know :(
Mike: I thought of that when I was making a case against him but, it left a lot of things unanswered. As in, Gerbil told me he didn't remember what the stats were exactly but that they were sonic rush stats. I recall SM stepping in and telling me he submitted around two bs stats. However it still left the question about what were the bs stats.
He got his SD at around Febuary-March but held off on providing a video for who knows what (youtube doesn't keep track of days). I disagree with carrying almost no weight as it carries a lot of weight. It shows that he can in fact make videos. All thats left is finding the bs stats which at this point could be anything (Edit: Time Machine?). Heck as far as kept records, there is nothing that says he was bsing stats in the first place (kept records though).
Quote
he didn't say it here he really can't since he comes online once in a blue moon and probably felt joy for being unbanned? I can't make much of a case for this but, just some tidbits.
Mike: I thought of that when I was making a case against him but, it left a lot of things unanswered. As in, Gerbil told me he didn't remember what the stats were exactly but that they were sonic rush stats. I recall SM stepping in and telling me he submitted around two bs stats. However it still left the question about what were the bs stats.
He got his SD at around Febuary-March but held off on providing a video for who knows what (youtube doesn't keep track of days). I disagree with carrying almost no weight as it carries a lot of weight. It shows that he can in fact make videos. All thats left is finding the bs stats which at this point could be anything (Edit: Time Machine?). Heck as far as kept records, there is nothing that says he was bsing stats in the first place (kept records though).
42
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: July 04, 2008, 10:18:18 pm »
I can't help but feel that you're talking to someone else Stefan. Maybe you should read my post again before jumping to conclusions.
The administrative bias is a dislike of them. Have you really seen their dislike actually affect their decisions when it came time to deal with them? The ks8 case is the only thing that contains such actions as does elecmouse's case as his video was ignored and the "multiple account" thing was dealt with already if you read through other posts.
I'd love to see this happen. Seriously I would.
As if this really matters. This post just translates into, "You only agree with Rolken because you think he's perfect and because you only want to get your point across. That is bad." Never did I say he was perfect. Do I agree with him just to get my point across? No, I agree with him because I agree with him and you really shouldn't say I need to critically examine posts when you are the one who needs to do it.
Who the hell are you talking to? This only proves that the poll was ignored. This is what I said:
The poll was pretty much ignored. How can I say that the poll unbanned ks8 when I say it did not unban him?
Increased amount of attention lead to his unbanning huh. Do you know how stupid that sounds? Look through this entire topic, there are only 4 posts here about ks8's banning before he was eventually unbanned. May 24, 2008 there was an entire topic about ks8. You can't lie and say this did not attract a lot of attention. Go forawrd to June 16th, the ks8 issue is brought back up again in the form of 4 tiny posts. All the posts are made between June 16th to June 17th. Now look at this:
Interestingly enough this post was made on July 3rd after it was bumped by elecmouse on, "« Reply #80 on: July 03, 2008, 09:59:27 AM »" Mike issued a response on, "« Reply #81 on: July 03, 2008, 10:14:18 AM »" The posts are only 15 minutes apart from each other. If we apply your increased moderator attention theory it is thrown out the window almost immediately because ks8 was not unbanned from May 24th to June 17th/July 2nd because you guys did not give your attention to the banning of ks8. Face it, if you guys really did analyze the situation then he would not have been unbanned by mike on July 3rd. Mike even says ks8's unbanning was something he did on his own without going through anyone about it.
Quote
1.) There has been administrative bias for years (sonicandamy, xebra). If the ks8 situation proves tsc is falling apart, tsc has been falling apart since its conception
The administrative bias is a dislike of them. Have you really seen their dislike actually affect their decisions when it came time to deal with them? The ks8 case is the only thing that contains such actions as does elecmouse's case as his video was ignored and the "multiple account" thing was dealt with already if you read through other posts.
Quote
2.) We are taking many steps to regulate bannings. We are instituting a forum that will keep a record of bannings, with reasons for and against keeping x person banned. If there is a clear mistake, we will have such an organized folder that we can immediately fix it.
I'd love to see this happen. Seriously I would.
Quote
3.) Rolken is a smart guy. Rolken is a very informed guy.
Rolken is -not- a perfect guy.
It is extremely illogical to agree with rolken every time -just- because of his status as extremely intelligent. He makes mistakes, and you should critically examine things by yourself before coming ot a conclusion. Claiming that 'Rolken beats RPG', in spite of whatever point is being made, is a terrible thing to do
As if this really matters. This post just translates into, "You only agree with Rolken because you think he's perfect and because you only want to get your point across. That is bad." Never did I say he was perfect. Do I agree with him just to get my point across? No, I agree with him because I agree with him and you really shouldn't say I need to critically examine posts when you are the one who needs to do it.
Quote
4.) It was not the poll in and of itself that brought KS8 back to TSC. You think that the poll was the reason that he was unbanned. I can guarantee you that Mike didn't just look at the poll, ee the yes votes, and unban KS8 based on popular opinion.
What brought KS8 issues back into the mainstream and ultimately unbanned him was the heavy amount of attention he was getting. The poll was a part of that, but it wasn't the end means at all. RPG was correct in saying that yes votes on a poll don't unban people. They didn't unban KS8. Increased attention (leading to increased moderator analysis) brought KS8 back.
Who the hell are you talking to? This only proves that the poll was ignored. This is what I said:
Quote
What this is telling me is that 14 morons voted yes and were ignored which left ks8 banned for as long as he was.
The poll was pretty much ignored. How can I say that the poll unbanned ks8 when I say it did not unban him?
Increased amount of attention lead to his unbanning huh. Do you know how stupid that sounds? Look through this entire topic, there are only 4 posts here about ks8's banning before he was eventually unbanned. May 24, 2008 there was an entire topic about ks8. You can't lie and say this did not attract a lot of attention. Go forawrd to June 16th, the ks8 issue is brought back up again in the form of 4 tiny posts. All the posts are made between June 16th to June 17th. Now look at this:
Quote
To the other admins, expect more of this from me. Normally I would go through someone else to make sure I was making the right decision, but I trust myself enough that I can make the right decision myself.
Interestingly enough this post was made on July 3rd after it was bumped by elecmouse on, "« Reply #80 on: July 03, 2008, 09:59:27 AM »" Mike issued a response on, "« Reply #81 on: July 03, 2008, 10:14:18 AM »" The posts are only 15 minutes apart from each other. If we apply your increased moderator attention theory it is thrown out the window almost immediately because ks8 was not unbanned from May 24th to June 17th/July 2nd because you guys did not give your attention to the banning of ks8. Face it, if you guys really did analyze the situation then he would not have been unbanned by mike on July 3rd. Mike even says ks8's unbanning was something he did on his own without going through anyone about it.
43
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: July 04, 2008, 03:08:48 pm »
RPG allow me address your points.
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=3450.msg35409#msg35409
He's said it before. Which means he said it before your stat re-entry doesn't take long comment although, he didn't say it here he really can't since he comes online once in a blue moon and probably felt joy for being unbanned? I can't make much of a case for this but, just some tidbits.
I completely agree with you about Gerbil fixing the time machine just for him but, thats all it is. Only Gerbil is making amends towards ks8.
(To people in general)
The entire issue that ks8 seems to say a lot is that you guys don't care. I'm going to go ahead and say that that is a load of crap...
... if it weren't true.
Okay guys just stop thinking and see it how I'm about to show you and think back to what you thought back then (note I could go into how the general chatroom reacted months ago whenever ks8 was brought up but I won't).
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=3229.0
Go back to April and you'll notice this topic. Read through the entire topic and notice the last post of the topic. April 3rd. Lets go forward one month shall we?
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=3450.0
May 24. In the entire span of one month and 21 days, nobody raised a question to ks8's banning which begs one question. Was his banning really badly handled? The answer is of course yes. But, at that time, did you really think it was badly handled? No one raises a question or doubt about ks8's banning until Shadowfan makes that topic almost two months after ks8's banning.
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=3450.msg35530#msg35530
Read RPG's post. Now read Stefan's post which is below his. While RPG didn't vote for any of the no options he did grain the topic with logic on why ks8 would remain banned. To be honest, I agree completely with RPG's post as does a moderator (or would be at the time) and it remains the sole reason why ks8 was banned for as long as he was.
Freeze.
What did you just think? If you agreed with what I just said then it says a thing or two about you. Let's turn our attention to this particular sentence made by Rolken:
If you wish to view its source, its here: http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=3229.msg34236#msg34236
While I'm not going to do a backround check on Rolken, I am going to say that he is the most sensible person here. I also know that you agree with me too.
Put that little statement next to RPG's post and try making sense out of that. Who is more in the right, RPG or Rolken? The answer is obviously Rolken. Even Shadowfan mentioned Rolken's statement but the topic was abandoned right after he said that. Looking back at the topic again I can sympathize that listening to people who are basically morons is bad. However, look at the voting. Here are the results:
No: 1
Yes: 12
Yes if he does not calculate scores: 2
Total No: 1
Total yes: 14
What this is telling me is that 14 morons voted yes and were ignored which left ks8 banned for as long as he was. At most there were 6 or 7 morons at that time while the rest of the voters were pretty much accepted by TSC.
While ks8 is unbanned now, would he really have been unbanned if this topic was not created? I think you know the answer.
My next question, where does this leave us? Does it leave us with an incapable staff that lets its own personal feelings affects its decisions? Does it leave us with a real sign that TSC is dieing? Does it leave us with a large mistake made on our parts that would not have come to light if this topic did not happen?
Now I'm going to tell you what I'm thinking right now which is that I'm expecting posts that will try to save face or try and refute some points. While some points may be refuted, you can not deny that it hits a mark or two.
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=3450.msg35409#msg35409
He's said it before. Which means he said it before your stat re-entry doesn't take long comment although, he didn't say it here he really can't since he comes online once in a blue moon and probably felt joy for being unbanned? I can't make much of a case for this but, just some tidbits.
I completely agree with you about Gerbil fixing the time machine just for him but, thats all it is. Only Gerbil is making amends towards ks8.
(To people in general)
The entire issue that ks8 seems to say a lot is that you guys don't care. I'm going to go ahead and say that that is a load of crap...
... if it weren't true.
Okay guys just stop thinking and see it how I'm about to show you and think back to what you thought back then (note I could go into how the general chatroom reacted months ago whenever ks8 was brought up but I won't).
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=3229.0
Go back to April and you'll notice this topic. Read through the entire topic and notice the last post of the topic. April 3rd. Lets go forward one month shall we?
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=3450.0
May 24. In the entire span of one month and 21 days, nobody raised a question to ks8's banning which begs one question. Was his banning really badly handled? The answer is of course yes. But, at that time, did you really think it was badly handled? No one raises a question or doubt about ks8's banning until Shadowfan makes that topic almost two months after ks8's banning.
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=3450.msg35530#msg35530
Read RPG's post. Now read Stefan's post which is below his. While RPG didn't vote for any of the no options he did grain the topic with logic on why ks8 would remain banned. To be honest, I agree completely with RPG's post as does a moderator (or would be at the time) and it remains the sole reason why ks8 was banned for as long as he was.
Freeze.
What did you just think? If you agreed with what I just said then it says a thing or two about you. Let's turn our attention to this particular sentence made by Rolken:
Quote from: Rolken
I believe you, but it's more important that the competitors can believe you.
If you wish to view its source, its here: http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=3229.msg34236#msg34236
While I'm not going to do a backround check on Rolken, I am going to say that he is the most sensible person here. I also know that you agree with me too.
Put that little statement next to RPG's post and try making sense out of that. Who is more in the right, RPG or Rolken? The answer is obviously Rolken. Even Shadowfan mentioned Rolken's statement but the topic was abandoned right after he said that. Looking back at the topic again I can sympathize that listening to people who are basically morons is bad. However, look at the voting. Here are the results:
No: 1
Yes: 12
Yes if he does not calculate scores: 2
Total No: 1
Total yes: 14
What this is telling me is that 14 morons voted yes and were ignored which left ks8 banned for as long as he was. At most there were 6 or 7 morons at that time while the rest of the voters were pretty much accepted by TSC.
While ks8 is unbanned now, would he really have been unbanned if this topic was not created? I think you know the answer.
My next question, where does this leave us? Does it leave us with an incapable staff that lets its own personal feelings affects its decisions? Does it leave us with a real sign that TSC is dieing? Does it leave us with a large mistake made on our parts that would not have come to light if this topic did not happen?
Now I'm going to tell you what I'm thinking right now which is that I'm expecting posts that will try to save face or try and refute some points. While some points may be refuted, you can not deny that it hits a mark or two.
44
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: July 03, 2008, 10:13:11 pm »
Yeah I was a bit late. I usually go with what people say so it gets kinda hard to break away and say, "wait what," due to me wondering what might happen if I do break away from the general flow of things and people. I had planned to post this a lot sooner but, we had a downtime so I couldn't post it and by the time the server got back up I forgot about this topic.
45
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: July 03, 2008, 06:48:59 pm »
To ks8:
For the record, I thought he was innocent a couple pages back when trying to prove him guilty made absolutely no sense, as in things didn't add up but, something told me to let other people handle it. Until decided to screw what everyone would think about me.
Also, your A and B is something I agree with.
On to the topic I guess:
Okay, cue Phoenix Wright music.
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=2882.0
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=2874.0
Topics in which elecmouse101 was called out in. The first, was a mere typo in which he was forgiven.
One reason why he should be banned is knocked off.
The second was a calling out of mew22. Note that there was a suspicion that elecmouse and mew are the same people. If you would refer to:
http://www.youtube.com/elecmouse101
You would find videos of two people usually playing together. In the video description it is said that the other person is mew. Also note that this is elecmouse's account. This establishes that they are in fact not the same person.
Second reason why he should be banned is destroyed.
Now it is said that elecmouse is bsing. That is a problem. Why is it a problem? Not because he is bsing but rather that there is nothing on this forum that calls him out on it. I asked GerbilSoft about it and he said he was bsing Sonic Rush records.
TSC accepts photos as proof of records. That much is well known. Photo evidence was asked for elecmouse's records which was never provided. As an alternative however, we got this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrTKiglH0-I
This video works just about as well as photo evidence and even though the quality is bad you can still see the times all of which are shoddy when ranked on the charts. Shoddy stats don't arouse much suspicion and are rarely called out on. I do not recall any first place records claimed by elecmouse which begs the question why bs was called out on him in the first place.
Last reason why he shouldn't have been banned this long is knocked off.
Note: Also seriously, wtf at ks8's stats being removed? He had videos of times he had achieved. At most his Game Gear should have been removed because it was established he did calculations wrong. Removing all of his stats was just stupid.
For the record, I thought he was innocent a couple pages back when trying to prove him guilty made absolutely no sense, as in things didn't add up but, something told me to let other people handle it. Until decided to screw what everyone would think about me.
Also, your A and B is something I agree with.
On to the topic I guess:
Okay, cue Phoenix Wright music.
* Rick shot
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=2882.0
http://www.soniccenter.org/forum/index.php?topic=2874.0
Topics in which elecmouse101 was called out in. The first, was a mere typo in which he was forgiven.
One reason why he should be banned is knocked off.
The second was a calling out of mew22. Note that there was a suspicion that elecmouse and mew are the same people. If you would refer to:
http://www.youtube.com/elecmouse101
You would find videos of two people usually playing together. In the video description it is said that the other person is mew. Also note that this is elecmouse's account. This establishes that they are in fact not the same person.
Second reason why he should be banned is destroyed.
Now it is said that elecmouse is bsing. That is a problem. Why is it a problem? Not because he is bsing but rather that there is nothing on this forum that calls him out on it. I asked GerbilSoft about it and he said he was bsing Sonic Rush records.
TSC accepts photos as proof of records. That much is well known. Photo evidence was asked for elecmouse's records which was never provided. As an alternative however, we got this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrTKiglH0-I
This video works just about as well as photo evidence and even though the quality is bad you can still see the times all of which are shoddy when ranked on the charts. Shoddy stats don't arouse much suspicion and are rarely called out on. I do not recall any first place records claimed by elecmouse which begs the question why bs was called out on him in the first place.
Last reason why he shouldn't have been banned this long is knocked off.
Note: Also seriously, wtf at ks8's stats being removed? He had videos of times he had achieved. At most his Game Gear should have been removed because it was established he did calculations wrong. Removing all of his stats was just stupid.
46
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: July 03, 2008, 02:05:09 pm »
Your name isn't elecmouse101 either.
Listen, just because I referred to you as the "other guy" doesn't mean I think you're a waste of time. Heck I refer to people as Lumpy, Squishy, and Sir Bun Buns (I'm not joking).
The reason people (probably) don't want you here is because of two things:
1. You're bsing.
2. Its in your head. <--- (Everything I've doug up seems to point to this because it disproves option 1 [lololol I've made the joke now get over it guys] )
The general reaction to new people is a "k" attitude. Meaning we don't really care. Same thing pretty much applies to a cleared suspicion.
I'll post what I dug up soon enough, I doubt you care but, It'll at least keep people from jumping to conclusions too much and away from the assumption that unknown people are usually bsing (still a ways to go though :/).
Listen, just because I referred to you as the "other guy" doesn't mean I think you're a waste of time. Heck I refer to people as Lumpy, Squishy, and Sir Bun Buns (I'm not joking).
The reason people (probably) don't want you here is because of two things:
1. You're bsing.
2. Its in your head. <--- (Everything I've doug up seems to point to this because it disproves option 1 [lololol I've made the joke now get over it guys] )
The general reaction to new people is a "k" attitude. Meaning we don't really care. Same thing pretty much applies to a cleared suspicion.
I'll post what I dug up soon enough, I doubt you care but, It'll at least keep people from jumping to conclusions too much and away from the assumption that unknown people are usually bsing (still a ways to go though :/).
47
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: July 03, 2008, 01:14:31 pm »
What about the other guy?
48
Gaming and Grazing / Re: ITT Games that were the biggest waste of your money
« on: July 02, 2008, 09:28:34 pm »
Like/Good use of money
Every game I bought.
Hate/Waste of money
Every game people gave me.
Every game I got free.
Every game I bought.
Hate/Waste of money
Every game people gave me.
Every game I got free.
49
Rules Revisions / Re: Establishment of Rules Committee
« on: June 27, 2008, 01:00:38 am »
Also curiously, when S+T is enacted, does this call for some ban revisions (I'm thinking no *insert explanation here* but, am just curious)>_>?
51
Wikkity! / Re: Official Utterly Long and Boring Chatroom Log Segments
« on: June 16, 2008, 04:48:42 pm »
Hell no. Refer to my previous statement of:
Quote
Only funny if you've been here since the beginning.
52
Wikkity! / Re: Official Utterly Long and Boring Chatroom Log Segments
« on: June 14, 2008, 11:51:43 pm »
Only funny if you've been here since the beginning. Also RPG of all people should know where this is coming from. As they say, "the shoe is on the other foot," or something.
<Starly> I would make a sick joke
<Starly> That maybe he was trying to get an extra life via insulin
<Starly> But I dont feel mean enough :(
<Rick> who are you and what have you done with the real Starly
<Starly> Blast, my covers blown
<Rick> are you making him give you oral!?
<Rick> you sick bastard
<Starly> He offered
<Rick> so you admit it
<Starly> In exchange for his thumbs
<Rick> "thumbs"?
<Rick> is that...
<Rick> mike!?
<Rick> you've kidnapped him too!?
<Starly> I was going to cut off his thumbs
<Rick> you are twisted
<Starly> No!
<Rick> you mean yes
<Starly> So did mike
<Starly> I mean
<Starly> Er
<Starly> Fuck.
<Rick> AHA
<Rick> I have seen through you're clever ruse
<Rick> your too
<Starly> I would make a sick joke
<Starly> That maybe he was trying to get an extra life via insulin
<Starly> But I dont feel mean enough :(
<Rick> who are you and what have you done with the real Starly
<Starly> Blast, my covers blown
<Rick> are you making him give you oral!?
<Rick> you sick bastard
<Starly> He offered
<Rick> so you admit it
<Starly> In exchange for his thumbs
<Rick> "thumbs"?
<Rick> is that...
<Rick> mike!?
<Rick> you've kidnapped him too!?
<Starly> I was going to cut off his thumbs
<Rick> you are twisted
<Starly> No!
<Rick> you mean yes
<Starly> So did mike
<Starly> I mean
<Starly> Er
<Starly> Fuck.
<Rick> AHA
<Rick> I have seen through you're clever ruse
<Rick> your too
53
Wikkity! / Re: Let's Play! Mystaria: The Realms of Lore!
« on: June 08, 2008, 02:44:21 pm »
Ok.
List:
Ferral = Dhengis (PPA still open for lion's name)
Priest = Maya (except no)
Birdguy = Krahzy
Thats it for now. :(
List:
Ferral = Dhengis (PPA still open for lion's name)
Priest = Maya (except no)
Birdguy = Krahzy
Thats it for now. :(
54
Wikkity! / Re: Let's Play! Mystaria: The Realms of Lore!
« on: June 08, 2008, 02:11:29 pm »
I nominate the name PPA Pedobear/Pedolion for Ferral.
55
Hax0ring / Re: What Utility is Best for Sonic Level Editing
« on: June 08, 2008, 12:13:00 pm »
wtf
56
Hax0ring / Re: What Utility is Best for Sonic Level Editing
« on: June 08, 2008, 02:08:01 am »And by best, I really mean most user friendly.
SonED noobs.
:(
57
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: June 08, 2008, 02:05:34 am »
elecmouse, just out of curiosity, what were all the bs stats (if possible can you please state the exact times in question)?
58
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: June 07, 2008, 06:49:34 pm »
The latest video was added 21 hours ago. I looked through your entire video sections and most of your Sonic videos are either "gameplay" or AR videos. The other two Sonic videos were a shoddy Final Hazard TA done three months ago and a supposedly results glitch of Coral Cave 1.
There are still no said videos on your page.
There are still no said videos on your page.
59
Hax0ring / Re: What Utility is Best for Sonic Level Editing
« on: June 07, 2008, 01:36:49 pm »Well, IMO, ESEII (Esrael Sonic Editor II), butThornRick will disagree with me as soon as he reads this <_<
SonED noob.
60
Information Kiosk / Re: Want To Be Unbanned
« on: June 07, 2008, 01:33:57 pm »
If you uploaded them yesterday in the evening why are they not on your page now. :(
The Sonic Center v3.9
Copyright 2003-2011 by The Sonic Center Team.