http://wiki.srb2.org/wiki/Greenflower_Zone_Act_1 max rings: 265 your highest score: 315
http://wiki.srb2.org/wiki/Greenflower_Zone_Act_2 max rings: 312 your highest score: 412
http://wiki.srb2.org/wiki/Techno_Hill_Zone_Act_1 max rings: 231 your highest score: 331
http://wiki.srb2.org/wiki/Techno_Hill_Zone_Act_2 max rings: 187 your highest score: 287
http://wiki.srb2.org/wiki/Castle_Eggman_Zone_Act_1 max rings: 410 (on easy; 400 on normal and above) your highest score: 500
http://wiki.srb2.org/wiki/Castle_Eggman_Zone_Act_2 max rings: 411 (on normal; 401 on easy, 391 on hard) your highest score: 461
um, calling BS most of your scores are just increased by 100 of the max possible, which can't just be a miraculous mistake
Title: Re: Uh, Ring Rush guy, your scores are impossible in rings
Post by: fastnaturedude on July 21, 2008, 06:36:53 pm
/me looks at links. I never really inspected the levels. Of all people, I never expected Ring Rush to BS. :< I am horrified at your behavior, RR. HORRIFIED.
Title: Re: Uh, Ring Rush guy, your scores are impossible in rings
Post by: Ash on July 21, 2008, 06:49:32 pm
Uh, is this Ring Rush guy like, the Rings master for like... every game?
I mean, it makes you wonder about lots of other scores.
Title: Re: Uh, Ring Rush guy, your scores are impossible in rings
Post by: Thorn on July 21, 2008, 07:27:58 pm
He's not BSing, you're just not thinking. He's beaten every score by a multiple of 50. *nudge nudge*
Title: Re: Uh, Ring Rush guy, your scores are impossible in rings
Post by: fastnaturedude on July 21, 2008, 07:35:48 pm
Thorn, how is he not BSing? Look at the scores on the official SRB2 Wiki. Ring Rush beat those, so he's BSing. You can't beat them.
Title: Re: Uh, Ring Rush guy, your scores are impossible in rings
Post by: Thorn on July 21, 2008, 07:48:57 pm
^Check MY scores, I've tied some of them. It's extremely possible, and it has to do with how the SRB2 Wiki makes its official count compared to the in-game ring counter. There's one key difference...
Also, after you told me that SRB2 beta was "public", and then fled the site after being caught, you are NOT the one to be talking about who's lying. :P
Title: Re: Uh, Ring Rush guy, your scores are impossible in rings
Post by: Ash on July 21, 2008, 08:15:46 pm
SRB2 wiki does the ring count according to how many rings are actually on the map (I can go into doombuilder and check these value myself, as well)
I find it a bit odd how some of the scores are just the max number of rings + 100, and it seems very impossible to exceed the max considering that number of rings on the map doesn't change unless you use object place or something :( :( :(
Title: Re: Uh, Ring Rush guy, your scores are impossible in rings
Post by: Thorn on July 21, 2008, 08:24:46 pm
Quote from: Ash
SRB2 wiki does the ring count according to how many rings are actually on the map
^That doesn't strike you as wrong at all? If it did that, it'd be short by 10 times the number of Super Ring monitors in the level. There's a third way to increase your ring count, too, and you're not considering it.
And yes, I'm deliberately beating around the bush. I'm not giving away competition strategies so that you can turn around and beat Ring Rush right after accusing him of BS.
Title: Re: Uh, Ring Rush guy, your scores are impossible in rings
Post by: Rick_242 on July 21, 2008, 08:26:50 pm
You two...
...
...FAIL quite clearly miss the point.
Post not edited by Thorn to prevent argument. Seriously.
Title: Re: Uh, Ring Rush guy, your scores are impossible in rings
Post by: Ash on July 21, 2008, 08:37:43 pm
nono, they count ring boxes too; I figured those would be self explanatory
a third strategy, hm
Title: Re: Uh, Ring Rush guy, your scores are impossible in rings
Post by: Ring Rush on July 21, 2008, 09:14:36 pm
...lol. The same site I used to learn what total to shoot for you use to call bs on me.
Seriously, I'm kind of reposting what thorn said but:
A] I'm not a bser. If I was, why would I bs on something as trivial as SRB2 rings. And why wouldn't I just match the "Total ring count" on SRB2wiki if I really never played the game? B] Notice how everything is beaten by 50 or 100 rings. That is no coincidence. C] Just as Thorn was saying, there is a third way to get rings, that *shock* *shock* comes in multiples of 50s.
That is all, just felt like I needed to say something as you are calling bs on me.
Edit: ...I don't HAVE a Castle Eggman 1 ring stat, yet you still call bs on me there.
Title: Re: Uh, Ring Rush guy, your scores are impossible in rings
Post by: Ash on July 21, 2008, 10:29:38 pm
oh, i got it now
very probable indeed; sorry for the misconception also i didnt realize you had no cez1 stat, sploops
Title: Re: Uh, Ring Rush guy, your scores are impossible in rings
Post by: GerbilSoft on July 21, 2008, 11:22:25 pm