The Sonic Center
The Lounge => Wikkity! => Topic started by: yse on October 04, 2007, 07:35:28 am
-
Or, more commonly, fake chats. But it also allows a bit of extension to include the Constitution.
Let me also make a quick note. "TSC-related fiction" does not extend to Sonic fanfiction because that has no place at TSC. Anywhere. Like ever.
By mike89
The Conventional Trilogy: The Grand Re-opening (http://www.soniccenter.org/mike89/fiction/grandreopening.htm) / Fake Chat mkII (http://www.soniccenter.org/mike89/fiction/fakechatmkii.htm) / The Egg Chat (http://www.soniccenter.org/mike89/fiction/eggchat.htm)
CherryMayNot (http://www.soniccenter.org/mike89/fiction/cherrymaynot.htm)
The Sonic Center Constitution of Infallibility (http://www.soniccenter.org/mike89/constitution.htm)
By SadisticMystic
My Fake Adventure (http://www.soniccenter.org/sm/files/mychat.htm)
By CosmicFalcon
Fake Chat mkII, CF-style (http://www.soniccenter.org/mike89/fiction/fakechatmkii_cf.htm)
He also did another one but I can't find it :(
By Spinballwizard
SB and the Beanstalk (http://spinballwizard.h-team.us/chat1.html) (Warning: Lame alert)
Also, important notice!
I am AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION :O
Help me remember what needs to go in it! Speak now or forever hold your peace >:O
-
^ There needs to be a comment to the likes of:
"Subsite admins hold complete control over their domain, but only provided that domain exists rather than 404ing."
See: erm, the subsites.
-
We need an amendment that makes fun of the recent surge in spambots in the general Sonic forum, such as "the presence of spam bots is not tolerated and will be met with immediate destruction by a ban hammer (the more violent the better).
I also propose a bill stating that fan fiction and fan characters suck and are too lame for this site. All in favor say AYE.
-
The constitution should begin with a prelude stating that any words to follow are entirely random, strung together through the use of a random number generator, and any references to any persons alive or dead, events, or places are entirely coincidental in nature. And then follow up by telling Zizou and co to kindly appreciate satire and hyperbole. From there, but this is just what I would do, you could insert words that make no sense as you see fit, and produce an odd laugh or two.
Alternatively you could open by saying that the following has been approved by an oligarchian power structure who wish at all costs to avoid disenfranchisement by giving you no rights to begin with. This is a great segway to humorous descriptions of the drafters of the constitution, those who you should all credit for their intellectual contributions. Make sure to tell everyone to abide to the constitution by the letter, never alter its contents in the slightest for fear of treading on the philosophical feet of the founders, and that all flaws present in their character and actions can be safely ignored in the name of patriotism. It will be just like America.
For substance itself, you could go on to a rule bashing unceremonious use of 'no u', 'I call bs', 'o rly', 'no rly', and all derivatives. Basically think of some things you don't like, and address them as rules so that you will have a subtle influence on the actions of anyone impressionable enough that they always act to appease. Oh, how about a rule stating: "While nothing of note is going on in chat, feeble attempts to instigate some sort of conversation must be made regardless of the quality of the ensuing discussion or its participants". Or a rule saying: "Pretending to ignore someone while making a point to tell them they are being ignored is punishable by use of the acid machine". Another idea I've got is: "Making ideas, people, events, and facts up, or openly contradicting yourself, then consequently laughing when nobody notices is rewarded with a free story to tell about how great you are". I've got more ideas, I do.
But for now I'll just post this. Afterwards, I'll attempt to upload my 2 fake chats, and hope this computer can do it.
-
THIS FACT MUST BE STATED!
"TSC has a growing population, and half of them are named either Mike or Dan"
Oh, and add commentary to your second one, Genus. If you don't mind.
-
Mikes ftw.
-
Penis size decreases as post count increases.
Nobody is on any account allowed to mention Linux to GerbiSoft. Srsly guys.
Douglas is only allowed to enter topics to make people lol. Anything other than that is probably a sign of the coming apocalypse.
<_<
-
Penis size decreases as post count increases.
Nobody is on any account allowed to mention Linux to GerbiSoft. Srsly guys.
Douglas is only allowed to enter topics to make people lol. Anything other than that is probably a sign of the coming apocalypse.
<_<
OH SHIT WE'RE DOOMED
-
Added link to my chat. Might make a new one that's less lame.
Constitutional Amendments:
1. Correction from Spaceship User to (If I had a) Banhammer
2. Section in Chat rules stating that voice is used but is pointless.
3. Link to bothelp and possible lolexplanation of CodeGirl
4. Some kind of antifurry comment somewhere.
Admittedly, I'm pulling these out of my ass.
Edit: Also Dans > Mikes.
-
Also Dans > Mikes.
QFT >_>
-
Also Dans > Mikes.
RPG's name is Dan and Thorn's name is Mike. Which side should I choose?
...
I think I'll just hide in a corner until everything solves itself.
/me hides in a corner
-
Also Dans > Mikes.
RPG's name is Dan and Thorn's name is Mike. Which side should I choose?
...
I think I'll just hide in a corner until everything solves itself.
/me hides in a corner
Well, RPG is Dan, Thorn is Mike...but Yse is Mike too, so I'm gonna have to side with the Mikes at the moment. Sorry RPG >_>
-
but there's taco on the dan side :(
-
I believe SBW's a Dan too. Oh, and Magnum's a Mike. I think MK's a Mike. SS101's a Mike
...that is if no one's lying in the member list
-
MK's a Dan n00b.
Also something else that needs to be added to the constitution: mike is definitely in league with SM and Sprint in the "fills-in-for-Rolken" category.
-
Something I've been meaning to do for a while, but have put off until now:
A reworking of the registration page (http://www.soniccenter.org/mike89/register.htm)
-
Also I forgot to tell you guys that I am currently writing Fake Chat 5...>_>...
-
mike: It's clever, but... I always thought you were kinda anti-FanFic. Even if it is only a page.
Also, according to the Sitewides, 25 people are more educated at cracking The Matrix Sonic Center than Rolken. :P
-
Constitution updated, Fake Chat 5 axed.
RPG this doesn't mean you have to stop writing it, this just means I won't claim it as my own work. >_>
-
Several users, mostly of the Spaceship User category but also CherryMay and flyby, are identified by their @ symbol...
Last I checked, our ops were just a few random people who happened to rub the admins the right way at the right time... also, rubbed in the right place.
Also I do not have a vagina, liar. Since when did Ink, Violet, and Joshu say anything significant anymore anyway >_>.
-
Also I do not have a vagina, liar.
Could've fukken fooled me! >_>
-
Also I do not have a vagina, liar. Since when did Ink, Violet, and Joshu say anything significant anymore anyway >_>.
That doesn't take them out of the endangered species protection act.
Also RPG you're the one with the long hair >_>
-
Im a girl too ok
-
oic
So you swing both ways. (i.e. <RPG> mmmballs)
-
It is common knowledge that I am female and bisexual noob
Girls are better tho.
-
I've just begun working on a fake chat... only got the first few opening lines at the time of writing.
NOT TO MENTION I AM GOING TO BREAK THE TRADITION WITH...
TIMESTAMPS
comments.
-
Put me in it or unpleasantness will befall upon you.
-
Timestamps are a pain to include. My lunch against yours you wind up abandoning the idea midway through.
Progress on fake chat 3: I'm at the very end, and it only needs a few lines to wrap up. But it's been this way for a solid few months so...lol.
-
Groudon you're in it already and I've only written the first 15 lines >_>
-
:D
-
Re: Constitution
9th Amendment: Section V: Bots of the Chatroom
(Feel free to rewrite; these are just jotted ideas)
1. ChanBot - supplies certain Users with their powers, caters to the will of Rolken
2. CodeGirl - reports new records from the Site for Users to brag about, identifies Regular Users, runs #wheel-of-fortune, starts global thermonuclear war, caters to the will of SadisticMystic
3. GerbilEgg - attacks Users who attack it, looks for Users upon query, caters to the will of GerbilSoft (which explains a lot)
4. Eggbot - whatever it did.
5. GerbilSoft - I'd say genus' glossary definition works here. >_> Add "rickroll Users and report on rickrolls" in there somewhere.
GerbilSoft-The current channel bot, programmed to summarise news articles, turn everything into an anti sony/microsoft argument, create :P pyramids, report on the results of deal or no deal, report fictional system specs, talk about gentoo, make urmom jokes, and drum.
-
I have a new project coming up! Stay tuned :o
Without giving too much away, I'm going for the easy targets.
-
I'M NOT A FURRY
-
I'M NOT A FURRY
Mental note: Find a way to work this in.
-
I will be highly amused if I make it into something. Therefore, it will never happen.
(Though holding, for several weeks, the record percentage of questions on the chatroom may have some effect)
-
Modified my proposed constitutional amendment.
Also PPA clearly you are a furry as it is Constitutional Universal Truth.
Also :o.
/me pray he's not an easy target
-
Am I in this new thing.
-
None of you are! Now you can all be rejects together!
-
o o
0
<--------
REJECTION!!!
(That was possibly the lamest attempt at an ASCII Phoenix Wright ever attempted.)
-
Easy targets as far as I know:
1. Me.
2. RPG
3. PPA
-
People:
-RPG
-KS8
-genus (maybe)
-PPA
-EggFL
-DsS
-sdj6707(?)
-SkyL
-S&A, bertin, et al.
-Paragod
-RR (just for an RPG ghost setup)
-GS
-Alondite
and that's pretty much everyone in the prospective pool right now.
-
Juicy details from Mike
<Stef|Cgi> what is this new project you are working on [sic]
<yse> i [sic] actually haven't worked on it for a week+ heh
<genus> mike's [sic] working on a project?
<SDM> another constitution?
<genus> mike [sic] is -working- on a -project-?
<Sondow|Civ4> genus [sic] how did you not know
<genus> I didn't know easily [sic]
<genus> that's how [sic]
<genus> mike [sic] is -working- on a -project-? :o
<Taillow> Old news [sic]
<SonicAD> -mike- [sic] is working on a project?
<yse> i [sic] am. and the more thought i [sic] give it the less good it seems to be [sic]
<Stef|Cgi> anyway i [sic] gtg [sic]
<Stef|Cgi> adios yo [sic]
<-- Stef|Cgi has quit (Quit: This just isn't my day!)
<Rolken> mike [sic] is it sonic/amy fanfiction [sic]
<genus> well [sic] what is it?
<Rolken> because [sic] I told you that was a bad idea [sic]
<yse> fuck [sic]. ruined [sic]
<yse> though [sic] you know [sic]
<genus> I want to start a rival project [sic]
<yse> one [sic] of these days i should do a fanfic parody [sic]
<genus> to [sic] motivate you to suck less >:( [sic]
<genus> wait [sic] hold on [sic] how about
<-- PsyMar has quit (Ping timeout)
<genus> a COLLABORATION :o [sic]
<yse> hm [sic]
<yse> you cannot be trusted to keep my secrets.
<genus> no [sic] see, I'm totally a pro person [sic]
<genus> like [sic] I got up one day and decided
<genus> "I should be more awesome" [sic]
<yse> <_<
<genus> and [sic] then I stretched out my little finger [sic]
<genus> and [sic] there was more awesome [sic]
<genus> and [sic] they called it "more awesome" [sic]
<Sondow|Civ4> genus [sic] who do you think you are
<Sondow|Civ4> god?
<yse> anyway [sic] genus
<yse> if you want to start a rival project
<yse> i [sic] have the perfect title
<genus> well [sic] it -is- modeled after the creation myth of Genesis [sic]
<yse> The Misadventures of a Linksys Router
<genus> make of that what you will [sic]
<genus> well [sic] what's your thing?
<genus> I at least want to know what I'm competing with
<yse> it [sic] is a parody of a current event in the news [sic]
<genus> there [sic] are a few of these [sic]
<genus> I assume it involves a linksys router [sic]
<yse> though [sic] as with all my other parodies, i [sic] want to at least have some basis in fact [sic]
<yse> oh [sic] man [sic]
<genus> possibly [sic] the telecom immunity scandal in the us [sic]
<yse> i [sic] threw you off the scent so easily.
<genus> I'll fill 30 pages with "screw you mike" and call it a day if necessary [sic]
<genus> I am not kidding!
<yse> yeah [sic] and you'll be universally condemned for defacing the name of parody.
<genus> how [sic] about if I actually do that in chat
<genus> then have me say it
<genus> like <genus> screw you mike
<yse> er [sic]
<genus> over and over in chat [sic]
<yse> its [sic] not a fake chat ok [sic]
<genus> guffaw [sic]
<genus> GUFFAW [sic]
<genus> this [sic] involves tsc?
<genus> and it's a -narrative-?
<yse> nope [sic]!
<genus> GUFFAW [sic]
<genus> WHEEZE [sic]
<genus> are [sic] you serious [sic]
<yse> i [sic] told you it was in the news!
<yse> when [sic] was the last time TSC was in the news?
<yse> ...actually, on second thoughts [sic], there is serious fake chat adaptation potential here [sic]
You heard it here folks, it isn't a fake chat and has nothing to do with TSC. Also people make a ton of punctuation errors in chat.
I decided that I'll do something less involved-either taking an article and replacing the key players of the event with the nicks of tsc'ers for potential hilarity, or 'grading' posts as an English teacher would. -THIS- IS ART.
Edit: I forgot to close the bold tags. But I like it better this way, it hurts your eyes and makes important details indistinguishable from unimportant details.
-
LOL, enough with the "spelling is correct" tags. It happens, and we all probably know that it's correct.
-
Who the hell corrects the spelling/grammar in IRC logs? We massacre the language in online chats, get over it >_>
-
Who the hell corrects the spelling/grammar in IRC logs?
Can't you see? genus does. (personally, I wouldn't bother with IRC logs, but I love to annoy my sister's friends by correcting them on AIM, which means almost everything they say).
-
Correct use of punctuation is for other chatrooms.
EDIT: Also, I am unsure as to whether you can call it incorrect when a handle that begins lowercase is begun as such at the beginning of a sentence. Sure, sentences should start with upper case, as should proper nouns, but when a proper noun is purposefully defined as all lower case, I always figured the rule about capitalizing proper nouns was down to always recreating them in an identical way. If you were to use "Mike" you could be talking about any of us, "mike" is specific. "mike89" moreso.